Wednesday, June 26, 2024

Damien Nettles: Investigation summary, conclusion and areas for re-investigation

When I began my examination of the case of 16-year-old Damien Nettles who disappeared on 3 November 1996 from Cowes, Isle of Wight, I hadn’t anticipated that I would still be writing about it nearly three months later. If you have arrived here without having read the previous posts in the series, here are the links in order:

Damien Nettles – The facts
Damien Nettles – Murder, manslaughter or misadventure?
Damien Nettles – Language analysis of Unsolved: The Boy Who Disappeared interviews – Part 1: Chris Boon
Damien Nettles – Language analysis of Unsolved: The Boy Who Disappeared interviews – Part 2: Abbie Scott, Chris Boon and Davey Boon
Damien Nettles – Language analysis of Unsolved: The Boy Who Disappeared interviews – Part 3: The Weatherman
Damien Nettles – Language analysis of Unsolved: The Boy Who Disappeared interviews – Part 4: Shirley Barrett
Damien Nettles – Who was Nicky McNamara?
Damien Nettles – Nicky McNamara: Untangling the rumours
Damien Nettles – No body, no crime?
Damien Nettles – Water, water everywhere

Right from the start I encountered discrepancies between different accounts of the same information – the time and date that Damien was last sighted on CCTV, what was rumoured to have happened at which of the two chalets in Gurnard, the number of suspects that were arrested, and many, many more inconsistencies that I haven’t included in the blog. Having to sort the one piece of true data from all the false is always going to be a pitfall of working solely with information that it is in the public domain because mistakes get copied over and over again. When writing up my posts, I have been as careful as I can be about getting important details correct so as to not repeat the errors that have gone before. Not taking any information at face value went hand in hand with this – particularly in a case where theories and rumours abound.

I chose Damien’s disappearance as my first ‘body not found’ investigation because I was born and grew up on the Isle of Wight. I don’t remember Damien going missing – I had left the Island by 1996 – and I only learned of his disappearance when I conducted my initial search in March this year for ‘no body murder’ cases. As I began to gather publicly available information about Damien’s disappearance, it was clear that I was going to have a lot to work with including numerous newspaper and magazine articles, the Damien Nettles website, Facebook pages, groups, posts and comments, missing persons websites, blog posts, podcasts, the Yorkies CCTV footage, the eight-episode Unsolved documentary series and over 2,500 associated comments on YouTube, the book The Boy Who Disappeared by Damien’s mother, Valerie, and more.

During the course of my investigation, I discovered that I have a friend who lived directly opposite the Shore Road chalet in Gurnard in November 1996. This isn’t someone I knew when I lived on the Isle of Wight – we became friends many years later. At the time, he was a helper at Cowes Youth Club and remembers Damien going missing well – it was big news. He was able to give me information about the couple who lived at the chalet at the time, and that he had never seen Damien there. I also discovered that I have a friend who lives opposite a property connected to one of the suspects arrested in 2011. Again, not a friend I knew when I lived on the Island, and we’ve only known one another for a few years. I found out that I had other connections with the case too – a mutual friend with one of Damien’s close friends, and another with one of the suspects. These are friends who are not from the Isle of Wight, and as with the other two, I didn’t know them when I lived on the Island. This shows that even years later, anyone – anyone at all – could know someone who may hold the key to finding the one piece of information that might help solve a missing person or no body murder case, or at least help to rule out an explanation or theory. It really is never too late to keep looking and making connections.

From publicly available information I discovered the identity of Mr X/The Weatherman. This was after I had completed my language analysis of his Unsolved interviews and reached the conclusion that he was lying – a conclusion that my (unpublished) investigation into who he was in 1996 and who he is now, appears to confirm. From publicly available information I also discovered the identities of the two suspects connected to the Marsh Road chalet. I conducted a considerable amount of (unpublished) work around them and built up a reasonably detailed picture of who they were, the places they had lived, their friends and associates, and their offending histories. In addition to this, I found information about various incidents that weren’t connected to Damien’s disappearance, but that either directly involved the couple or could be linked to them – incidents that would have been prime fodder for public speculation about Damien’s potential fate.

So what did happen to Damien?

The findings of missing persons research coupled with the circumstances surrounding Damien’s life and disappearance supports the theory that he went missing unintentionally, and that he is no longer alive. However, from a criminological perspective, I couldn’t find sufficient research evidence that would support a conclusion of murder, or that Damien could have been the victim of exploitation in connection with organised crime (abducted into modern slavery for example). This really only leaves manslaughter, and misadventure/accident with a fatal outcome, as possible reasons for why Damien disappeared unintentionally and has remained unfound. In terms of probability, fatal accidents due to injury or drowning are the leading cause of death in adolescents, accounting for around a third (32%) of all deaths of 10-19-year-olds. This is followed by cancer (22%) and suicide (19%), whereas fatal assaults account for just 3% of adolescent deaths. In all cases, the risk of dying for young men is notably higher than for young women.

In terms of coming to harm at someone else’s hands, whether by fatal assault or being hit by a vehicle, the larger the victim’s body, the harder it is to dispose of, representing a literal dead weight if deceased or unconscious that is awkward to move alone. Additionally, a body is difficult to dismember without equipment, a suitable space to do it in and at least some knowledge of anatomy, and it takes an industrial furnace at 800–1000 °C to properly cremate a body. Of all the possible ways to dispose of a body, concealment by storing, (attempted) combusting and dismembering are the exceptions, representing a combined one tenth of homicide disposals, and feeding to animals and sealing in concrete are the absolute exceptions. These methods are the exceptions because they require inventiveness, planning, resources and in most cases, co-conspirators on the part of the offender, yet all five have been suggested in the rumours about what happened to Damien’s body.

Research into homicide-related body disposal sites indicates that for stranger homicides, offenders tend to leave their victims at or very near the crime scene. In friend/acquaintance homicides, victims’ bodies are moved an average of 17km from the crime scene with just 100m being the most common distance. In over two-thirds of stranger and friend/acquaintance homicides, victims’ bodies are either left uncovered, covered with leaf litter, branches and debris, or put into a shallow hollow (either man-made or natural). Less than 5% of all homicide victims (which includes those killed by a family member) are buried at any depth because digging requires a suitable location, time, physical effort and equipment. Where victims’ bodies are driven away in a vehicle, most are laid within 10m of a road/track, with the average distance being 17m. In around 10% of friend/acquaintance homicides, victims’ bodies are deposited in waterways, and this rises to 18% in cases of stranger homicide.

These findings cast considerable doubt over the likelihood that if Damien did die from a fatal assault in the flat above the butcher’s shop in the centre of Cowes town, that his body was moved to Fellows Road, stored there for two weeks in a sail bag, then moved again to Shore Road before being moved once more to be buried in the woodland behind my friend’s chalet, particularly given the amount of planning, people, resources and effort that this would have involved and the difficulty of digging a hole of any size or depth in an area where tree roots are holding the ground together, never mind the risk of being discovered with every move and how rapidly a body decomposes in air at room temperature. If Damien was the victim of a fatal assault or had been hit by a car, his body is much more likely to have either been left at or very near the crime scene, put in the sea if the water’s edge was immediately accessible, or if transported from the scene in a vehicle, driven away promptly and left either uncovered or partially covered within metres of a road.

On 8 November 1996, six days after Damien was last sighted, the police are reported to have searched all open areas in and around Cowes using a number of dogs and aerial surveillance. Ground searches of the local area including Cowes, Northwood and Gurnard by Damien’s family and members of the public were also carried out soon after he disappeared. A subsequent, intensive police search took place in 1998 in and around Gurnard, and in 2011 the marsh and surrounding land near Stag Lane plus various properties associated with the arrested suspects were searched. More recently, the scrubland that borders both Cowes and Gurnard that runs along the length of the inland side of Prince’s Esplanade and Egypt Esplanade, has been completely cleared. If Damien’s body was transported from the crime scene and left relatively exposed close to a road or track with vehicular access, the probability is high that it would have been found by now, if not by the police, by a member of the public. The privately owned woodland behind Shore Road in Gurnard has also been extensively dug over the course of several years by friends of the Nettles family, and was searched by a cadaver dog during the filming of Unsolved: The Boy Who Disappeared. In an Unsolved ‘clip’ interview, the dog’s handler, Mick Swindell, was asked about the accuracy rate of finding a body, to which he replied: ‘Touch wood we’ve never missed a body yet […] and there’s never been a body found in an area that we’ve declared as clear.’

All land-based searches have so far failed not only to find Damien’s body, but any of his clothing or property – the camera that he is known to have had with him for example. This leaves the very small possibility that his body has remained hidden or buried on land that is inaccessible to the public, or the much higher probability that water became his final resting place. In addition to the land searches on 8 November 1996, a marine unit scoured the banks of the Medina Estuary and the shoreline around to Gurnard, and the Harbour Master at Cowes conducted a thorough search with boats. That Damien’s body wasn’t located at the time of his disappearance or in the days, weeks and months that followed, or during the search of the marsh in 2011, can be attributed to the frequently inefficient nature of even the most committed search efforts, plus rate of decomposition, aspects of how a body can behave in water and factors that negatively affect detection, that increase the chances of it remaining undiscoverable. Missing persons data suggests that 9% (1 in 11) of people who are known to have gone missing in water remain unfound compared to 1% of all long-term missing persons.

Even when a person is suspected to have gone missing in relatively predictable water far inland from the coast, their body can remain undiscoverable for weeks despite continuous, specialist searching. The recent disappearance of Nicola Bulley is a good example. Nicola was declared a high-risk missing person by the police at 11:28 on 27 January 2023, 27 minutes after the initial missing person report was received from her partner, and as it later transpired, just two hours after she had entered the River Wyre upstream from St Michael's on Wyre. The high-risk missing person report triggered a priority police search for her whereabouts. During the second week of the search, Lancashire Constabulary stated that they believed the circumstances of Nicola’s disappearance were not suspicious, nor criminal, and did not involve a third party. Their working theory that Nicola had fallen into the river and drowned was met with criticism and scepticism by her family and friends, who stated that the hypothesis was unsupported by evidence.

23 days of intensive searching of the River Wyre all the way to Morecombe Bay 28 km north of St Michael’s on Wyre by the police using divers, helicopters, drones and underwater sonar, plus a specialist, private underwater search and rescue team and land searches by the public, failed to find Nicola’s body. 24 days after Nicola disappeared, a couple walking their dog discovered her body adjacent to a fallen tree 1.6km downstream from St Michael's on Wyre. The prediction of recovery by the expert from the Association of Lowland Search and Rescue – that Nicola was most likely to be recovered on 20 February – was highly accurate, and demonstrates that even in a relatively small search area with far fewer variables than those found in coastal waters, a body can remain submerged and therefore hidden from view for weeks. On 26 June 2023, a Coroner’s Inquest established that the cause of Nicola’s death was accidental drowning with no evidence that she had been harmed before she went into the water.

Conclusion and areas for re-investigation

Although it seems unlikely that Damien is still alive, there were several potential sightings in the days, weeks and months following his disappearance, some by people who didn’t know Damien, such as the man in Totland, Isle of Wight, who on 16 November 1996 spoke to a young man on Granville Road who fitted Damien’s description and who said that he had just moved to the area, and others by people who knew Damien well, such as the school friend who in April 1997 thought he saw Damien from the back walking along a busy main road in Wilton, Wiltshire, and prior to this, a sighting on 4 November 1996 at around 12:30 in Newport, Isle of Wight, by a man who worked with Damien at Gurnard Pines in the summer who believed he saw Damien getting out of a small dark car at Church Litten opposite Safeway. Were these sightings – particularly the Newport one – properly investigated at the time? If not, can they be re-investigated now?

If Damien had been the victim of a fatal assault in Cowes (or elsewhere) and his attacker, instead of leaving him or putting him in the sea, had had help and immediate access to a vehicle to transport him away from the crime scene, his body may have remained undiscovered because it was concealed or buried somewhere unfrequented or inaccessible to the public, for example, on private land, or in a heavily planted pond that could have prevented it from resurfacing. Statistically, this is an unlikely scenario, however, unlikely doesn’t mean impossible.

Even so, teenagers are ten times more likely to have a fatal accident than be the victim of a fatal assault, and fatal injury sustained during an accident is the most common cause of death in teenagers. This includes drowning, but given that Damien was walking when he was last seen on CCTV, could he have been hit by a car on his way home? The viability of this as a potential line of inquiry could be tested against information that has already been gathered, but that may not have been fully investigated. For example, there were two accounts of a youth walking along Baring Road near the Solent Middle School at around 00:30 on 3 November 1996 – one that was received in early 1997 from a young man who was walking home from his parents’ house, and the other after an appeal for new information in November 1998 from a motorist and his wife. If the youth was Damien, the Baring Road sightings place him well away from the coast. Was identification attempted at the time? There was a friend of Damien’s from Gurnard – Duncan Butler – who Valerie writes was the spitting image of Damien. Has Duncan been ruled in or out as being the youth walking along Baring Road at 00:30 on 3 November 1996? The motorist’s account states that the youth had been carrying a blue and white striped plastic bag – can this be linked to any of the earlier sightings of Damien in Cowes? The motorist is also claimed to have reported that the youth was walking in the middle of the road. If the youth was Damien, walking in the middle of the road coupled with wearing dark clothing may have increased his risk of being hit by a car. If the youth was Damien and he was hit by a car, he could have been transported away from the scene.

In addition to fatal injury sustained during an accident being the most common cause of death in teenagers, and teenagers being ten times more likely to be involved in a fatal accident than be the victim of a fatal assault, as an adolescent who had been consuming alcohol on a night out in an area of High Night-Time Economy in close proximity to water and who was last seen alone, Damien’s risk of meeting with a water-related, unintentional death was increased. Therefore, all things considered, the most probable, evidence-based explanation for Damien’s continued disappearance is that whether intentionally or by accident, he entered the sea, after which certain factors came together that were unconducive to life, and prevented his body from being located. Whether location or any sort of recovery might be possible after nearly three decades is a question that could be posed to experts and academics in the field of marine search and rescue, which in terms of research, knowledge, technology and equipment has progressed substantially during that time. For example, if Damien had entered the sea at Sun Slip and his body had become entangled after sinking, is it possible that traces of his body or clothing might still be found in the area?

Although this concludes my blog series on the disappearance of Damien Nettles, I will be continuing to work with Locate International as part of the team assigned to Damien's case.

Damien's disappearance remains an active missing person case. If you have any information that could help find Damien, please contact Hampshire Police on 101, quoting ‘Operation Ridgewood’, or if you would prefer to remain anonymous, Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111.

Sources

College of Policing (2023) Independent external review of Lancashire Constabulary’s operational response to reported missing person Nicola Bulley.

Google maps.

Hill, L. (28 February 2022) Concerns raised over clearing of protected woodland in Gurnard ‘without permission’. Island Echo.

Horsburgh, L. (21 November 2023) Nicola Bulley review: Key report findings at a glance. BBC News.

Isle of Wight County Press (15 November 1996) Concern grows for missing boy, 16.

Isle of Wight County Press (29 November 1996) Possible sighting of missing Cowes boy in Totland.

Isle of Wight County Press (11 April 1997) Sighting gives fresh hope to parents of missing boy.

Isle of Wight County Press (3 December 2004) Appeal for anyone who saw Damien.

Mateus, M., Canelas, R., Pinto, L. & Vaz, N. (2020) When Tragedy Strikes: Potential Contributions From Ocean Observation to Search and Rescue Operations After Drowning Accidents. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7 (55): 1-8.

missingpeople.org.uk

Nettles, V. (2019) The Boy Who Disappeared. London: John Blake Publishing.

Newiss, G. & Greatbatch, I. (2017) Men missing on a night out: Exploring the geography of fatal disappearances to inform search strategies. University of Portsmouth, National Crime Agency and UK Missing Persons Bureau.

Perkins, D. & Roberts, P. (2011) The U.K. Missing Person Behaviour Study. Northumberland National Park MRT and The Centre for Search Research.

Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (2020) Adolescent mortality.

Unsolved: The Boy Who Disappeared: Ronny the cadaver dog (2016) BBC3, 21 July.

Whitehead, J., Franklin, R. & Mahony, T. (2024) Where are homicide victims disposed? A study of disposed homicide victims in Queensland. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 8 (100451).

Thursday, June 13, 2024

Damien Nettles: Water, water everywhere

In this tenth post of a series that examines the disappearance of 16-year-old Damien Nettles on 3 November 1996 from Cowes, Isle of Wight, I will be taking a detailed look at waters surrounding the Island, exploring what happens to bodies in water and at sea, and considering data on missing persons whose bodies have been found in water.

If you have arrived here without having read the previous posts in the series, here are the links in order:

Damien Nettles –The facts
Damien Nettles – Murder, manslaughter or misadventure?
Damien Nettles – Language analysis of Unsolved: The Boy Who Disappeared interviews – Part 1: Chris Boon
Damien Nettles – Language analysis of Unsolved: The Boy Who Disappeared interviews – Part 2: Abbie Scott, Chris Boon and Davey Boon
Damien Nettles – Language analysis of Unsolved: The Boy Who Disappeared interviews – Part 3: The Weatherman
Damien Nettles – Language analysis of Unsolved: The Boy Who Disappeared interviews – Part 4: Shirley Barrett
Damien Nettles – Who was Nicky McNamara?
Damien Nettles – Nicky McNamara: Untangling the rumours
Damien Nettles – No body, no crime?

In Murder, manslaughter or misadventure? I considered the potential reasons for Damien’s disappearance in relation to personal, geographical and behavioural risk factors, statistical data, and criminological theories. The aim was to try and assess the likelihood that he disappeared intentionally or unintentionally, and whether this was due to an accident, misadventure, or as a result of a crime. I concluded that he probably disappeared unintentionally, and from a crime point of view based on individual risk factors, statistical probability, routine activity theory, the victim-offender overlap and the homicide-geographical-deprivation relationship, that he was more likely to have been the victim of manslaughter than of murder. However, some of the same factors that increased his risk of becoming a victim of manslaughter, namely his age, being male, being on his own, and being under the influence of alcohol (and possibly drugs), also increased his risk of meeting with misadventure or an accident. In relation to this, there is one significant factor that criminology doesn’t consider – a missing person’s proximity to water and the associated risk of a fatal outcome.

Missing on a night out

A 2017 study by researchers Geoff Newiss and Ian Greatbatch that examined fatal disappearances of men who were last seen ‘on a night out’ is particularly relevant to Damien’s case. The study’s sample was drawn from missing persons data from between January 2010 and August 2015, and although the sample size was small at 96 individuals, the inclusion criteria was very specific – each man had to have gone missing following an evening or night of socialising in an alcohol consumption environment such as pubs, bars, nightclubs or an event such as a wedding or a party, he had to have been reported missing, and there had to have been some doubt as to where he had gone and what had happened to him (for example, men seen entering water and getting into difficulty were excluded). The men in the sample were aged between 16 and 62, with 71% aged 25 or under. The main findings of the study as they relate to Damien’s disappearance were as follows:

  • In 60% of cases, the person remained missing for longer than a week – this is in contrast to just 5% of all missing person cases.
  • For 84% (81) of cases, there was a clear indication that the missing person had consumed alcohol and/or drugs prior to their disappearance.
  • 65% (62) of cases involved disappearances from areas of High Night-Time Economy (HNTE) – typically city or town centres with pubs, bars and nightclubs that are heavily populated at night-time.
  • In 90% (56) of HNTE cases, the bodies were recovered from water. However, for 60% (37) of HNTE cases, the last known place of the missing person was a street, compared to just 8% (5) that were directly by water (e.g. towpath, harbour-side, jetty, etc.).
  • Overall, in 89% (85) of the 96 ‘missing on a night out’ cases, the bodies were found in water: rivers (52), canals (11), sea, beach or shore (11), harbours, docks, quays or marinas (6) and lakes (5).
  • Of the 44 missing persons for whom cause of death was known, 93% (41) drowned, 5% (2) fell, and 2% (1) suffered cold water shock.
  • Of the 52 available verdicts recorded by coroners, 60% (31) were accident, 4% (2) were misadventure, 29% (15) were open (including inconclusive) and 8% (4) were narrative. The possibility therefore that some cases involved men intentionally entering water cannot be discounted.

The police’s theory for many years was that Damien had tried to swim across the Solent to Portsmouth to see his sister, Sarah, and had drowned. Though this seems like an unlikely scenario, in the days immediately prior to his disappearance, Damien had visited Sarah at her student digs. She writes that he arrived too late to eat the spaghetti bolognaise that she had made him, and they went straight to a club on the pier in Southsea where she remembers reminding him ‘the whole night to calm down with the beer’. They left the club early because Damien was ‘so drunk’, and after arriving back at her room, Damien promptly fell asleep on the floor. At some point during his visit, they also had had a conversation about drugs. Damien told her that he wanted to know what it felt like to ‘take drugs’, and Sarah told him that if he ever was going to do it, that she wanted to be there to make sure that he was okay. Damien returned home to Gurnard the following day, and Sarah said that she would visit him that weekend. She didn’t, and on the evening of Saturday 2 November, Damien was reported by several witnesses in Cowes to have been going from pub to pub, looking for his sister.

From Sarah’s description of their night out in Southsea, Damien appeared to be acutely vulnerable to the effects of alcohol. This may have been due in part to drinking on an empty stomach, but also because of the complex developmental changes that occur in the brain during adolescence. The prefrontal cortex, which controls impulses, isn’t fully developed in teenagers, and when alcohol floods the brain's reward circuits with dopamine, this impulse control deficit makes it difficult for teenagers to resist pleasure. Consequently, teenagers don’t pace themselves when they drink alcohol, and are vulnerable to drinking more and faster than their bodies are able to keep up with. Another characteristic of adolescence that can amplify the effects of alcohol is higher head-to-body ratio. Within five minutes of drinking alcohol it reaches the brain, and due to teenagers having a higher head-to-body ratio than adults, a comparatively large part of the alcohol ends up in the teenage brain.

Alcohol is associated with disinhibition and can lead users to behave out-of-character, out-of-control or excessively. Underage drinking in particular can lead teenagers to make poor decisions and engage in potentially risky and/or harmful behaviour. Damien is known to have consumed alcohol on the evening of 2 November 1996, and whilst he didn’t appear to be rolling drunk in the CCTV footage from Yorkies when he bought chips at 23:39, he was certainly far from sober. It is unknown whether Damien had taken any illicit drugs in addition to drinking alcohol that evening. He did use cannabis, and according to his friend, Chris Boon, speed and at some point (not necessarily that evening) they had taken some ‘trips’ (hallucinogenic drugs). This suggests that his conversation with Sarah may have been about other ‘drugs’, which really only leaves cocaine, ecstasy and ketamine in terms of popular recreational substances, particularly in the 1990s. In the interest of gaining a fuller picture to help better understand what might have contributed to Damien’s disappearance, knowing which ‘drugs’ Damien wanted to know what it felt like to take, could be beneficial. For example, hallucinogenic substances can cause users to take risky yet deliberate decisions, as can cocaine. Common risks associated with taking cocaine include panic attack, heart attack and/or stroke, and those of ecstasy include overheating and/or dehydration. The effects of ketamine include feeling detached and altered perceptions of time/space, and the risk of injury without knowing is common because pain is numbed. Mixing ketamine with alcohol is dangerous, and the main advice to never use it without being with other people you trust.

Damien was eating chips when he was last seen on the Cowes High Street CCTV at 00:02, which doesn’t fit with the appetite suppressing effects of some drugs, particularly speed, cocaine or ecstasy. However, he had bought the chips twenty minutes earlier, and so he was perhaps taking longer than might be expected to get through them. Maybe he wasn’t feeling all that hungry, but thought he’d better eat something to try and sober up a bit before he got home. Whilst taking any drug with alcohol increases the risk of the harms associated with each, even if he had consumed only alcohol that evening (and maybe a bit of cannabis), he will still have been at risk of making potentially hazardous decisions due to alcohol’s disinhibiting effects on the brain in addition to alcohol-related physical impairments such as poor coordination, loss of balance, numbness, and slowed breathing and heart rate.

Night-time + alcohol + water = increased risk of fatality

Going back to the missing on a night out study findings, for the few cases where the missing person was last known to be directly by water, night-time (reduced vision) + alcohol-related impairments (disinhibition, risky decision-making, poor coordination, loss of balance) + beside a body of water = high risk of fatal consequence (accident or misadventure) certainly seems to be true. Additionally, dangerous responses to cold water peak at water temperatures between 10 and 15°C. In particular, cold water shock, where sudden immersion in cold water can trigger reflexive gasping, rapid breathing or hyperventilating, and an increase in heartrate and blood pressure, is an involuntary response to the body being suddenly or unexpectedly immersed into water that has a temperature of 15°C or less. It can be the precursor to drowning, and quickly creates a drowning emergency if water is inhaled and staying afloat is compromised. 

Sea temperatures at Cowes in October range between 15.1°C and 17.3°C, and in November between 12.7°C and 15.9°C. Taking an average for 31 October/1 November this range becomes 13.9°C to 16.6°C, with a mean temperature of 15.25°C. This would have made Damien’s risk of cold water shock relatively significant, particularly as the month of November 1996 was recorded as being colder than average, and his breathing and heartrate will have been slower than normal due to alcohol consumption, which may have raised his susceptibility to sudden involuntarily respiratory/circulatory increases.

But what of the significant majority of men and boys who go missing on a night out whose bodies were found in water, but whose last known place was a street? There must have been water nearby, but why did they leave the street and go so close to the water that they ended up in it? Unfortunately, there are no research answers to these questions as yet, but we can hypothesise. Fifteen years of data from the Water Activity Incident Database indicates that the consistent majority of drowning victims are male (upwards of 80%). This is thought to be because men are more likely than women to participate in swimming and water sports under the influence of drugs and alcohol. Around half of all incidents involving under 19s are a result of swimming and walking/running near water, and around half of these incidents occur at river, coast, beach and shore locations. So there are some commonalities between male drowning victims where the circumstances are known, and male missing on a night out fatalities in water, namely consumption of alcohol and/or drugs, being a teenager, and river/coast/beach/shore locations. Maybe for some men who go missing on a night out, a waterside walk was on their route home. For others, perhaps the decision to enter the water was deliberate (deciding to go for a swim) or accidental (slipping and falling in).

I also have another theory. It may sound a bit off the wall, but in areas of HNTE, public urination is so common that in some places it has become normalised. When drunk and disinhibited, given the choice of peeing against a wall (and the consequences of poor aim/splashback) or walking a little way to pee into a known body of water, do some men choose the water, only to slip and fall in? Might this help to explain accidental drowning/cold water shock associated with men who go missing on a night out whose last known location is a street?

The waters surrounding Cowes

Although the Solent is a seawater strait, geologically it is a submerged river that extended from west to east and swung round the eastern end of the Isle of Wight at a time when sea-level was low and the English Channel was dry. This river channel has a series of terraces which descend to 46 metres below sea-level at the deepest point off the east of the Isle of Wight. Currents are complex and strong in the Solent off Cowes and change direction from a roughly westerly to easterly direction and vice versa with the tides. Low tide at Cowes on 2 November 1996 was at around 22:45. High tide was between 04:00 and 06:30 the following morning, and so the tide would have been on the flood and the tidal current flowing eastwards when Damien was most likely to have entered the sea.

The opinion of the harbour master at Cowes at the time was that if Damien had drowned, his body would have turned up within days. It is reported that five days after Damien vanished, the police drafted in a marine unit to scour the banks of the Medina Estuary (River Medina) and the shore round to Gurnard, and according to the harbour master, a thorough search was undertaken with boats. However, the sea and bodies do not always do what is expected. In which direction and how far Damien’s body may have travelled depends on multiple factors such as where he entered the water, whether his body became stuck or remained mobile, how far his body moved with each tidal current, and the speed at which his body progressed through the stages of decomposition. If he had entered the sea anywhere off the Esplanade west of the Royal Yacht Squadron at the mouth of the Medina Estuary, his body may have remained in the area due to an eddy (circular current) that develops on the flood tide between The Green and Egypt Point. It takes a while for this eddy to develop and form in deep water, and so whilst his body may have eventually come ashore in the same area, due to a tidal phenomenon characteristic of the Solent known as a ‘stand’, the sea can remain at high water level for up to four hours. It is therefore very possible that his body could have made its way into the East Solent.

There are also other potential entry points to the water that may not have been previously considered. Damien was last sighted at 00:02 on Cowes High Street walking in a northerly direction just before the junction with Sun Hill to the left. A few metres past this junction to the right is a public slipway known as Sun Slip. 90 metres north of this opposite the bottom of Market Hill is Market Slip (where the Harbour Lights pub was at the time) and 50 metres beyond this, Watchouse Slip on Watchouse Lane at the south end of The Parade. All three slipways, which are accessible at all state of tide, are situated on the Medina Estuary, which extends 6.8km from its tidal limit at Newport Harbour to its 1.75km wide mouth between Cowes and East Cowes that opens into the Solent. The estuary’s shoreline is approximately 14.4km, and even at low water, a single, relatively wide but shallow channel remains.

Water continually circulates into and out of an estuary. Tides create the largest flow of saltwater, while river mouths create the largest flow of freshwater. When dense, salty seawater flows into an estuary, it has an estuarine current – common at high tide. Saltwater is heavier than freshwater and so estuarine currents sink and move near the bottom of the estuary. When less-dense freshwater from a river flows into the estuary, it has an anti-estuarine current. Anti-estuarine currents are strongest near the surface of the water and at ebb tide, and this strength depends on the flow and size of the feeding river. However, the tidal currents in the Medina Estuary differ from those of a natural estuary due to a 300-metre-long harbour wall at East Cowes, and an equally long concrete breaker at the entrance to Cowes Harbour, as this model by ABPMer shows. The tidal current flowing into the estuary is reduced to begin with as the water level rises, then a central eddy begins to form in the region of the slipways and strengthens during the hour before high water, causing cross currents. The eddy dissipates during the stand, during which period the tidal current in the Solent changes to a westerly flow, then as the water level starts to drop, the anti-estuarine current takes over briefly prior to low tide.

There are also multiple underwater structures in the Medina Estuary such as jetty and harbour footings and pilings, channel markers, cables, anchor chains and buoy lines, as well as submerged manmade debris (e.g. rope, propellers, fishing lines and nets), rocks and seaweed, that could cause a sunken body to become entangled and remain trapped. Although the film quality is dated by today’s standard (and the music is annoying) this 12-minute piece of drone footage shot in 2015 gives a comprehensive bird’s eye view of the Medina Estuary at low tide from its mouth at Cowes, all the way to the centre of Newport. Watchouse Slip, Market Slip and Sun Slip come into view at 0:17, 0:20 and 0:23 respectively.

The footage shows the sheer size and scale of the estuary, and how easily a body that entered its waters could remain hidden from view. If Damien had entered the water in the region of the slipways, unless his submerged body became entangled on something within the estuary, he could have been carried into the Solent. Once there, his body is likely to have travelled eastwards on the stronger flood tide currents. The image below maps the journeys of four individuals who went missing in the Solent’s waters and whose bodies were located. All four individuals were carried eastwards on the flood tide currents that follow the course of the old riverbed, as indicated by the directional arrows on each line:

The names of the individuals, when and where they were last seen, and when and where their bodies were found, are as follows:

Rebecca Allen – Last seen on the evening of 30/05/2015 in Yarmouth. Her body was located at 13:00 on 01/06/2015 in the water near to Brambles Bank (a sandbank in the middle of the Solent that forms at low tide). Time in the water: 1-2 days.

Elezaj Shkelzen – Last seen at 18:00 on 04/08/2020 leaving Lymington for Langstone Harbour on his jet ski. At 20:00 his jet ski was found in the water by Stokes Bay. His body was located at 10:50 on 10/08/2020 in the Solent just over one nautical mile off Ryde Pier. Time in the water: 5-6 days.

Ben Hilton – Last seen at 22:18 on 08/06/212 at the catamaran jetty at Portsmouth Harbour. His body was located at 09:00 on 18/06/2012 in the water near Hayling Island. Time in the water: 9-10 days.

Marc Richardson – Last seen on 31/10/2023 in the Portsmouth area. On 02/11/2023 he is said to have been in phone contact (type of phone contact not been stated) and his car was located in Bransbury Car Park in Southsea. His body was located at 15:00 on 03/11/2023 in the water near Selsey. Time in the water: 1-4 days (depending on whether the phone contact was actually from him).

What happens to bodies in water

In addition to how different bodies of water behave, whether the cause of death is drowning or otherwise, human bodies sink to the bottom of water once air has left the lungs. How quickly a body sinks can depend on environmental factors such as the salinity of the water, distance from the surface to the bottom of the water, tides and currents, and factors affecting the buoyancy of the person including age, bone density, body composition, and the clothes that they are wearing. For example, clothing can trap layers of air, which may increase the period of initial buoyancy; however, once this air has dissipated from the clothing, initial buoyancy is lost and the body sinks to the bottom. How long a body takes to surface again can depend on the same factors that affected its initial buoyancy, plus other factors such as footwear (for example, whereas heavy boots/shoes hinder buoyancy, trainers may aid it) when and what food was last consumed, seasonal water temperature, the water’s bottom temperature, water depth, debris and structures that could cause entanglement, and rate of decomposition. In warm, shallow water, decomposition works quickly and a body will surface within two or three days due to bloating from gases produced from internal decomposition processes (putrefaction). In cold water, the bacterial action that causes a body to bloat with gas is slower and therefore can increase the time it takes for a body to bloat/float, or it may be so slowed that the body stays on the seabed. If this happens, the skin will absorb water and peel away from the underlying tissues in about a week, and the exposed flesh will be scavenged by fish, crabs and sea lice. If the bottom of the water is 30 metres or deeper, the combination of pressure and temperature prevents a body from becoming buoyant and consequently, it may never surface.

For bodies that do surface after sinking, floating occurs for only as long as the decomposition gases are trapped. This may leave only a small window of time in which the body is visible in the water – days rather than weeks. On land/in air in a warm environment, a bloated body can be in active decay where fluids evacuate from the body’s orifices in as little as a week after death. At this stage, organs, muscles, skin and cartilage become liquified, and the odours of putrefaction are extremely unpleasant and long-lasting (which is why I won’t even be considering the ‘stored in sail-bag for two weeks at Fellows Road’ rumour). At this point, a floating body is subject to the factors that affect decomposition in both air and water, including airborne insect activity, and scavenging by fish and seabirds. After a few days, bloat gases dissipate and the body deflates. With the tissues that once held the body together having liquified or been scavenged, the body becomes body parts. In air, what’s left of the body begins to dry out. In water, it sinks to the bottom again.

With an average surface sea temperature at Cowes at the beginning of November of 15.25°C, a body that was free to move in open water could take anything between 10 and 28 days from the initial point of sinking to resurfacing again and floating as it progresses through the bloat stage of decomposition. Factors such as being male, tall and skinny (denser frame, no fat) will lengthen the time that a body remains submerged. Salt water (denser than a body) and the presence of carbohydrates (e.g. chips) in the stomach (gases can be produced quicker) may decrease the time.

Where a body surfaces in the sea and in what state of decomposition will depend on how far it has travelled and how long it has been in the water. Whether floating or moving along the seabed, bodies can travel great distances due to tides, currents, waves and wind. One of the bodies in the missing on a night out study was found 80kms from the person’s last known location. Bodies may wash ashore whole (if still composed or in bloat) or in parts (any time from active decay onwards). Only a couple of days ago, body parts that had washed up on the beaches at Roker and Seaburn in Wearside between February 13 and April 8 earlier this year were identified as belonging to Roy Johnson, 49, who had been reported missing on January 20. This shows that even during the winter months, it can take just three weeks for a body to become dismembered by the sea.

Summary

Damien closely fits the men missing on a night out criteria for being found in water – he went missing in an area of HNTE that was within metres of a large body of open, tidal water, he had been drinking alcohol, he was reported missing, and there is doubt over where he went after he was last sighted and what had happened to him. If Damien did enter the water, wherever this may have been, whatever his reason was for doing so and whatever caused him to die, his fully clothed body will have likely lost its initial buoyancy before daylight on 3 November 1996 and sunk to the bottom of the water. If his body had remained free and mobile, it may have taken up to 10 days to resurface, in which time it could have travelled many kilometres in an eastward/south-eastward direction on the twice-daily flood tide currents. Equally, it could have become entangled whilst at the bottom of the water either when it sank or as it was moved with the tides and currents, and remained trapped and hidden from view – particularly if he had entered the water from a slipway on the Medina Estuary where there are multiple structures that a body could become caught up on. That he was wearing clothes and lace-up boots may have increased the chance of his body becoming snagged. If his body had remained free and floating, being found would have depended on being in the right place at the right time to be spotted in the short window between resurfacing due to bloating, and subsequent deflation. His dark coloured clothing would have made his body much harder to spot in the ocean (there's a reason why lifejackets are bright orange). Remaining unseen, his body, which after three weeks in the sea would have started to fragment and disperse, would have sunk again. If his body had travelled far enough east, it may have found its way into the deep terraces of the old Solent River where it is likely to have remained to this day.

In the next and (possibly) final post of this series, I will be looking back over my work on Damien’s case, summarising my findings so far, and considering whether there are any new or remaining avenues that require further exploration before bringing the series to a close.   

Damien's disappearance remains an active missing person case. If you have any information that could help find Damien, please contact Hampshire Police on 101, quoting ‘Operation Ridgewood’, or if you would prefer to remain anonymous, Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111.

Sources

ABPMer (2016) Cowes Outer Breakwater. YouTube.

ABPMer (2016) Isle of Wight Tide. YouTube.

BBC News (25 July 2016) Damien Nettles: The boy who disappeared.

Channel Swimming & Piloting Federation (2024) Dover tide tables for 1 Nov 1996 – 30 Nov 1996.

Courts and Tribunals Judiciary (2021) Chief Coroner’s Guidance No.17 Conclusions: Short-Form and Narrative.

Cowes Harbour (2024) Port Information: Slipways and Public Landings.

Dennison-Wilkins, L. (2021) Body recovery from water study.

Gibb, G. & Woolnough, P. (2007) Missing Persons: Understanding, Planning, Responding. Grampian Police.

Google maps.

Harvey, G. (11 June 2024) Human remains on Sunderland beaches are from missing Newcastle man. The Northern Echo.

Hulme, M. (December 1996) UK Climate: Monthly climate summaries – November 1996.

Hunsucker, J. & Davison, S. (2012) Time Required For a Drowning Victim to Reach Bottom. Journal of Search & Rescue, 1 (1): 19-28.

Isle of Wight Council (N.D.) Medina Estuary.

Isle of Wight County Press (15 November 1996) Concern grows for missing boy, 16.

Ministry of Justice (2023) National statistics: Coroners statistics 2022: England and Wales.

National Coastwatch Institution (2024) Solent Tides and Currents.

National Crime Agency (2023) UK Missing Persons Unit: Missing Persons Data Report 2021/2022.

National Ocean Service (2021) Classifying Estuaries: By Water Circulation – Estuaries Tutorial.

Nettles, S. (28 September 2008) Post to public Facebook group – Justice for Damien Nettles. Facebook.

Nettles, V. (2019) The Boy Who Disappeared. London: John Blake Publishing.

Newiss, G. & Greatbatch, I. (2017) Men missing on a night out: Exploring the geography of fatal disappearances to inform search strategies. University of Portsmouth, National Crime Agency and UK Missing Persons Bureau.

Sanders, J., Whittington, J. & Williams, M. (2005) Body Float Information. National Underwater Rescue-Recovery Institute.

Saner, E. (5 April 2023) The war against wild toileting: is there any way to stop people weeing – and worse – in the street? The Guardian.

SafeSite iow (20 June 2015) Isle of Wight River Medina. YouTube.

World Sea Temperature at SeaTemperature.org (2024) Cowes average November sea temperature.

Talk to Frank

tidetimes.org.uk

Wansbeck Paddle Sports Club (2019) Tidal constants on Dover.

Water Incident Database (2024) Annual reports and data.

West, I. (2013) Solent Geology.

Wednesday, June 5, 2024

Damien Nettles: No body, no crime?

In this ninth post of a series that examines the disappearance of 16-year-old Damien Nettles on 3 November 1996 from Cowes, Isle of Wight, I will be taking a brief look at Daniel Spencer – primarily because in May 2011, he was arrested on suspicion of murdering Damien. His file got as far as being referred to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), but he was eventually released from bail without charge in June 2012 due to lack of evidence. 

If you have arrived here without having read the previous posts in the series, here are the links in order:

Damien Nettles – The facts
Damien Nettles – Murder, manslaughter or misadventure?
Damien Nettles – Language analysis of Unsolved: The Boy Who Disappeared interviews – Part 1: Chris Boon
Damien Nettles – Language analysis of Unsolved: The Boy Who Disappeared interviews – Part 2: Abbie Scott, Chris Boon and Davey Boon
Damien Nettles – Language analysis of Unsolved: The Boy Who Disappeared interviews – Part 3: The Weatherman
Damien Nettles – Language analysis of Unsolved: The Boy Who Disappeared interviews – Part 4: Shirley Barrett
Damien Nettles – Who was Nicky McNamara?
Damien Nettles – Nicky McNamara: Untangling the rumours

Daniel is interviewed in episode 7 of Unsolved: The Boy Who Disappeared. He was door-stepped on his way home from work by Unsolved reporter, Bronagh Munroe, in what is probably best described as a failed attempt to try and make him ‘confess’. Daniel is interviewed between 14:47 and 16:08 – here is the link to the episode on YouTube if you have not already watched it. My intention had been to do a language analysis of the interview, but given that Daniel is understandably on the back foot from the moment Bronagh accosts him and says ‘I want to talk about Damien Nettles’, it is impossible to make a reasoned judgement in terms of truth or lie detection. Additionally, the one minute and nineteen second interview is filmed using at least two cameras and there are angle and frame changes galore, meaning that we have no idea in which order some of the questions were asked, or what questions some of the answers were in response to.

In a similar vein to Shirley Barrett’s interview, the footage cuts from a scene where Daniel is uncomfortably but calmly answering Bronagh’s quick-fire questions at 15:30 to him suddenly being mildly annoyed with her at 15:31, before the footage jumps again at 15:35 where he swears a bit, and then continues to answer Bronagh’s questions before riding away on his bicycle at 15:55. If this was done for dramatic effect and to paint Daniel in as poor a light as possible, it was a monumental flop. He got mildly confrontational and swore a bit. He didn’t lose his temper. He used single negatives when asked if Nicky McNamara had something to do with Damien’s death. He was consistent in his denial of knowing anything about Damien’s disappearance. He didn’t hesitate in confirming that he had been arrested and questioned by the police. If he is innocent of any involvement, he was justified (if somewhat insensitive) in saying that the case had ruined his life.

There are things though that Daniel did say, is said to have said, and is said to have had, that warrant further attention. In response to Bronagh asking him ‘What would you say to Valerie Nettles?’ he replies ‘that I’m sorry for her loss.’ ‘I’m sorry for your loss’ is a phrase that is only said when someone has died, and there are plenty of commenters under the episode on YouTube who profess that because he said this, he must know that Damien is dead and is therefore guilty in some way. However, given that he was arrested for Damien’s murder (implying that Damien is dead) and kept on bail for over a year while the police conducted searches for Damien’s body and put their case together for the CPS, coupled with it being twenty years since Damien went missing without a trace, it could be argued that ‘I’m sorry for her loss’ has a pretty reasonable explanation, and is more realistic than ‘I hope she finds him’.

Unsolved also claimed to have spoken to more than ten acquaintances of Daniel who all ‘suspected’ that he may known something about Damien's disappearance. Bronagh spoke to a local private investigator who she claimed had said that he had spoken to the same sources. At 10:08 in episode 7 he says: ‘I’m talking to one of our sources. Mr Spencer repeatedly referred to Damien Nettles as a little c**t’ and that he ‘did say on more than one occasion if there’s no body, there’s no crime.’ So why would Daniel have called Damien a little c**t? Did he actually know Damien or have any dealings with him? There’s nothing to suggest in any of the Unsolved interviews with Damien’s friends that this was the case. Daniel was 22 when 16-year-old Damien went missing. Could Daniel have been one of the slightly older group of friends that Damien had started to associate with?


Damien lived on Woodvale Road in Gurnard at the time and had done since 1990 when his family had moved to the Isle of Wight. His circle of friends will have consisted of people of his own age who he went to school with in Cowes and Carisbrooke, and the slightly older group of friends from his summer job at Gurnard Pines (although summer job friends come and go and he’d been back at school for two months before he disappeared). Daniel was living on Westhill Road in Ryde in November 1996. Prior to this he lived on Hunnyhill in Newport for a brief period in late 1995/early 1996, and before that, Dover Street and Nelson Street in Ryde. Distance-wise, Woodvale Road in Gurnard is between 9.4 and 11.8 miles from Westhill Road in Ryde, depending on the route taken.

The Isle of Wight is a small place, but contrary to what people like to say about it, everyone doesn’t know everyone else. When you are sixteen and relying on public transport, lifts from your parents or your own two legs to get around, if you have no reason to venture beyond the area of your home, school or weekend/summer work (and those family/friendship circles), you just don’t mix with people from different areas. Damien will have known the north-west quarter of the Island reasonably well and in particular Gurnard, Cowes, the shopping areas in Newport, and the immediate area around Carisbrooke High School. Living mostly in Ryde, Daniel will have known the north-east quarter very well. That’s where his closest connections will have been, and according to newspaper reports, where the significant majority of his offending occurred. His only known offence in the north-west quarter was being drunk and disorderly in Cowes on 7 August 1996. I think that it’s doubtful that Damien and Daniel knew one another other, and even less likely that Daniel had any kind of dealings with Damien that would give him reason to repeatedly refer to him as a little c**t. It boils down to someone who doesn’t know Daniel very well (an acquaintance) telling a stranger what Daniel is supposed to have ‘repeatedly’ called Damien.

So what about Daniel saying ‘if there’s no body, there’s no crime’? If the police were trying to pin a murder on me that I hadn’t committed, I would probably say that too – particularly if I didn’t know the law and that a murder conviction can be brought without the need for the victim’s body as evidence. ‘If there’s no body, there’s no crime’ is not a veiled confession – it’s a way of saying ‘they can’t do me for murder if there’s no body’. It’s a form of self-reassurance. Daniel is also said to have been in possession of witness statements that according to the local private investigator were: ‘actual police statements and we couldn't work out where he got these statements from’. It was stated that one of them was given by the witness who said that Daniel may have seen Nicky McNamara pinning Damien against a wall. Daniel is said to have shown it to people and confronted the person who had made it. Neither the private investigator nor Unsolved say when Daniel is said to have been in possession of these witness statements. However, it’s unlikely to have been before he was arrested because there was no case to answer to prior to this. Perhaps this detail was omitted on purpose, because the criminal justice system procedure as it relates to evidence disclosure prior to a suspect being interviewed by the police is really very simple – a defence solicitor will normally obtain disclosure from the police prior to consulting with the suspect. It is the defence solicitor’s role to obtain as much information from the police as possible prior to the suspect being interviewed. Disclosure may be a few sentences briefly explaining the circumstances of the offence, or it could be a full disclosure of the entire police case and all the evidence.

A witness statement is a form of evidence. When someone is arrested, the evidence of the grounds on which they have been arrested is disclosed to them by the police. Suspects/defendants and/or their solicitors who receive official copies of witness statements that are made against them get a copy of the front of the statement, but not the back (which has the witness’ address on it). Additionally, suspects are normally told the witness’ name. The only person who doesn’t receive a copy of the statement at this stage (or indeed right up the point of trial if the case goes to court) is the witness who made the statement. So of course Daniel will have been in possession of witness statements – he was arrested on suspicion of murder and held on bail for over a year. His solicitor (and therefore he) will have been in possession of official police copies of the fronts of the statements, including Paul Foster’s, as part of the disclosure process. How else are solicitors supposed to defend suspects against what they are being accused of based on the evidence that will support the prosecution’s case in court if the arrestee is charged? It can only happen if the defence knows what witnesses have said. It upholds fairness in criminal justice proceedings, and prevents malicious chargings and prosecutions.

To protect witnesses, intimidation by suspects and/or their solicitors who try and influence witnesses to change or drop their statements, is a criminal offence. Did Daniel confront Paul Foster to try and get him to drop his statement, or was it simply because he was angry that he was being accused of murdering Damien, and that this hinged on Paul Foster having told the police that many years previously he had witnessed someone who he couldn’t be sure was Daniel Spencer watching who he thought was Nicky McNamara beating up a lad who at the time he didn’t think was Damien Nettles? Who did Daniel actually call ‘a little c**t’? Maybe it was Paul Foster.

In an article that appeared in the Isle of Wight County Press on 15 June 2012, Damien’s mother, Valerie, is quoted as saying: ‘if people are not guilty then they should be left to get on with the rest of their lives’. For one reason or another, that hasn’t happened. Consequently, the prevailing narrative that Nicky McNamara ‘murdered’ Damien needed to be examined and questioned, but this has only led me to doubt its plausibility. I have found nothing to support it being even remotely true. And with that, I’m going to draw a line under Nicky McNamara, Daniel Spencer, and anyone else who has been criminally implicated in Damien’s disappearance. That’s not to say that a crime couldn’t have taken place – the possibilities of what, when, where, why and generic who can still be explored – but unless new, direct evidence is found against Nicky or any of the individuals who in 2011 were arrested and subsequently released from lengthy bails without charge, there is no good reason that I can find to believe that they were involved.

On the suggestion of one of my readers, in the next post I will be taking a detailed look at the tides and currents in the waters surrounding the Isle of Wight, exploring what happens to bodies in water and at sea, and analysing data on identified human remains that have washed ashore.

Damien's disappearance remains an active missing person case. If you have any information that could help find Damien, please contact Hampshire Police on 101, quoting ‘Operation Ridgewood’, or if you would prefer to remain anonymous, Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111.

Sources

Crown Prosecution Service (2019) Witness Statements and Memory Refreshing.

Finden, R. (6 June 2012) Fresh blow on search for Damien. Isle of Wight County Press.

Google maps.

Home Office (2003) Giving a witness statement to the police – what happens next? London: Home Office Communication Directorate. Page 3.

Isle of Wight County Press archives (5 May 1995  to 23 December 2005) Results for “Daniel Alan Spencer”, “Daniel Spencer”, “Danny Spencer” and “Dan Spencer”. Search conducted 23 May 2024.

Nettles, V. (2019) The Boy Who Disappeared. London: John Blake Publishing.

Olliers Solicitors (2024) FAQs – What happens when a suspect is interviewed?

Unsolved: The Boy Who Disappeared: 7 – The Search (2016) BBC3, 31 July.